Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Launched May 2006
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and K110D (6MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and K110D (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-1 iHS was revealed 6 years later than the K110D and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the K110D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Pentax K110D. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Pentax K110D
| TG-1 iHS | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | May 2006 | More recent by 73 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 210k | Sharper screen (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| K110D | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax K110D
| TG-1 iHS | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Pentax K110D has specifications of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS versus the K110D.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and K110D is 91 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and K110D.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-1 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger TG-1 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K110D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax K110D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax K110D |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2006-05-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 585g (1.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $1,000 |