Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Announced September 2008
- Replaced the Pentax K100D S
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax K200D, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-1 iHS was launched 3 years after the K200D which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-1 iHS scores versus the K200D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Pentax K200D. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Pentax K200D
| TG-1 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | September 2008 | More modern by 45 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| K200D | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax K200D
| TG-1 iHS | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS provides exterior measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has sizing of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the TG-1 iHS against the K200D.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and K200D is 91 and 61 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and K200D.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-1 iHS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax K200D |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $399 | $600 |