Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-1 iHS was brought out 3 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the Q-S1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Pentax Q-S1
| TG-1 iHS | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Q-S1 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2014 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 27 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax Q-S1
| TG-1 iHS | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-1 iHS versus the Q-S1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and Q-S1 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The image here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and Q-S1.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS uses the smaller sensor which will make obtaining bokeh harder. The more aged TG-1 iHS will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2014-08-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 250 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $399 | $250 |