Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Pentax Q7, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is very similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was released 15 months before the Q7 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the Q7 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Pentax Q7. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Pentax Q7
TG-1 iHS | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
Q7 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | More modern by 15 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax Q7
TG-1 iHS | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q7 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Pentax Q7 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b274e/b274e85e3db49b7f0b8569cc7415aae5f6a3034b" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and Q7 is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdb32/cdb329081c3e249be106c779d3ec68d3d2aeb7c5" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and Q7.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS contains the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF more difficult. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b689/5b689ceab2fe0aad444c0723fa3cd0947c2bd34c" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1c4f/e1c4f313a680e2e256f4b0fb56cae120fdcb761c" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax Q7 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash settings | - | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 250 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI90B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $399 | $480 |