Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax WG-3, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-1 iHS was launched 14 months earlier than the WG-3 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the WG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Pentax WG-3. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Pentax WG-3
| TG-1 iHS | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| WG-3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 14 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax WG-3
| TG-1 iHS | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with external measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax WG-3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the WG-3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and WG-3 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and WG-3.
Clearly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax WG-3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 610k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $399 | $300 |
