Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37


71 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Introduced March 2009

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70 Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax X70, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the X70 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The TG-1 iHS was launched 3 years after the X70 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax X70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-1 iHS scores against the X70 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Pentax X70. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Pentax X70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Pentax X70
TG-1 iHS | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Newer by 39 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax X70 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
X70 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax X70
TG-1 iHS | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has outside dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Pentax X70 has dimensions of 110mm x 83mm x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax X70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the X70.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and X70 is 91 and 71 respectively.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and X70.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos though you really should factor the age of the cameras into account. The more modern TG-1 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax X70 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax X70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax X70 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2009-03-02 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 610k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 9.10 m |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 410 grams (0.90 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $399 | $200 |