Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
68 Imaging
44 Features
33 Overall
39
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed August 2005
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Pentax ist DS2, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and ist DS2 (6MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and ist DS2 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-1 iHS was announced 6 years after the ist DS2 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax ist DS2 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-1 iHS matches up versus the ist DS2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Pentax ist DS2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Pentax ist DS2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Pentax ist DS2
| TG-1 iHS | ist DS2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | August 2005 | Newer by 82 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 210k | Crisper screen (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax ist DS2 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| ist DS2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax ist DS2
| TG-1 iHS | ist DS2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers physical dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Pentax ist DS2 has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Pentax ist DS2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS versus the ist DS2.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and ist DS2 is 91 and 68 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and ist DS2.
Plainly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will provide more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer TG-1 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax ist DS2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax ist DS2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax ist DS2 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2005-08-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 605g (1.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $399 | - |