Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was released 3 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the WG-5 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-1 iHS | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
WG-5 GPS | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | May 2012 | More modern by 33 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-1 iHS | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features physical measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d459e/d459ed03961dbb6e017038cb1fcff76cd91e8e5c" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and WG-5 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d933/2d933e5017f9eb9ef6da17e274e9be67bb8fd989" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and WG-5 GPS.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ceb8d/ceb8d0a63c38699ce15197defbc75d6d9fb8eca2" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d85d/6d85dab120470e0d77a896929f63f6f0cb17d5de" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-05-08 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 236 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 240 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $399 | $500 |