Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-1 iHS was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TG-1 iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+495k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| WG-M1 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 28 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1
| TG-1 iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features exterior measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the WG-M1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and WG-M1.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to render extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-05-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI90B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $399 | $2,000 |
