Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung EX2F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly close but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 7 months earlier than the EX2F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the EX2F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung EX2F
| TG-1 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+610k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX2F | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung EX2F
| TG-1 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS provides outside dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the EX2F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and EX2F.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The TG-1 iHS features the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier. The older TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI90B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $478 |