Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung EX2F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly close but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 7 months earlier than the EX2F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the EX2F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung EX2F
| TG-1 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+610k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX2F | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung EX2F
| TG-1 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS provides outside dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the EX2F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and EX2F.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The TG-1 iHS features the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier. The older TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI90B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $478 |