Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- Refreshed by Samsung GX-20
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is fairly similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 5 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the GX-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung GX-10. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung GX-10
| TG-1 iHS | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 | September 2006 | More recent by 69 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 210k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| GX-10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung GX-10
| TG-1 iHS | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the GX-10.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and GX-10.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-1 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-1 iHS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 793 grams (1.75 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $850 |