Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- Refreshed by Samsung GX-20
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is fairly similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 5 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the GX-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung GX-10. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung GX-10
| TG-1 iHS | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 | September 2006 | More recent by 69 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 210k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| GX-10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung GX-10
| TG-1 iHS | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the GX-10.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and GX-10.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-1 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-1 iHS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 793 grams (1.75 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $850 |