Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- Refreshed by Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is fairly similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was unveiled 5 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the GX-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung GX-10. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung GX-10
TG-1 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 69 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
GX-10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung GX-10
TG-1 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2807d/2807d2ad7952b2e623535a28c7981732735dd6f6" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae2d8/ae2d87844c75dda0e21de220d4e8c24e53cbdb85" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and GX-10.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-1 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-1 iHS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b025c/b025c113d3dc259ce8ef0a2693a09696a078e02e" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53319/5331928261717fb0722a87aa8b4831fcc41b841f" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-10 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2006-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 793 grams (1.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $399 | $850 |