Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung GX-1S, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 6 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the GX-1S for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung GX-1S. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung GX-1S
| TG-1 iHS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 | January 2006 | More modern by 77 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 210k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| GX-1S | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung GX-1S
| TG-1 iHS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the GX-1S.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and GX-1S.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will provide greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The newer TG-1 iHS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung GX-1S |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2006-01-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 610k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $850 |