Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-1 iHS was manufactured 3 years after the HZ10W which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the HZ10W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung HZ10W. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung HZ10W
| TG-1 iHS | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| HZ10W | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung HZ10W
| TG-1 iHS | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the HZ10W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and HZ10W is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The image underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and HZ10W.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-1 iHS to resolve more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The newer TG-1 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also called | - | WB500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 249g (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $399 | $300 |