Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
88 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Launched September 2010
- Later Model is Samsung NX200
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the NX100 (15MP) is very comparable but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and NX100 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 21 months after the NX100 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-1 iHS scores versus the NX100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung NX100. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung NX100
| TG-1 iHS | NX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| NX100 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 610k | Crisper display (+4k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung NX100
| TG-1 iHS | NX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers external measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX100 has measurements of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the NX100.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and NX100 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and NX100.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX100 will show extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-1 iHS should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung NX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung NX100 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2010-09-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | DRIMe Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | VGA AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 282 gr (0.62 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 62 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 563 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 420 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $386 |