Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
88 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Launched September 2010
- Later Model is Samsung NX200
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the NX100 (15MP) is very comparable but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and NX100 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 21 months after the NX100 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-1 iHS scores versus the NX100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung NX100. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung NX100
| TG-1 iHS | NX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| NX100 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 610k | Crisper display (+4k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung NX100
| TG-1 iHS | NX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers external measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX100 has measurements of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the NX100.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and NX100 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and NX100.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX100 will show extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-1 iHS should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung NX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung NX100 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2010-09-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | DRIMe Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | VGA AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 282 gr (0.62 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 62 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 563 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 420 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $386 |