Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Previous Model is Samsung NX210
- Successor is Samsung NX500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung NX300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was introduced 18 months earlier than the NX300 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-1 iHS scores versus the NX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung NX300. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung NX300
TG-1 iHS | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
NX300 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 18 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 610k | Clearer display (+158k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung NX300
TG-1 iHS | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS enjoys exterior dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the NX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a24c5/a24c5db05ec3fd8a24ba450e31fb7062e00d8572" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and NX300 is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/332f6/332f67643fbd1260cfe8fbb9e044d1b5b2a00f72" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The pic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and NX300.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung NX300 will deliver extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0218/c021814f4237aaa9c9d6e2490708aa11ea0cd4be" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0296c/0296cd324224766c00ffbd109b8d1c4c0fde6e92" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung NX300 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-05-08 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of display | 610k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 331 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 330 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI90B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $399 | $750 |