Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37


96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung SL102, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The TG-1 iHS was launched 3 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the TG-1 iHS matches up vs the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung SL102
TG-1 iHS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 41 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
SL102 | TG-1 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung SL102
TG-1 iHS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the SL102.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and SL102.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-1 iHS to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger TG-1 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung SL102 |
Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 610k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $399 | $130 |