Clicky

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
40
Overall
37
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
21
Overall
27

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2012
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
  • Additionally Known as ES55
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Overview

In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung SL102, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-1 iHS was launched 3 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the TG-1 iHS matches up vs the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung SL102

 TG-1 iHS SL102 
LaunchedMay 2012January 2009Fresher by 41 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution610k230kClearer screen (+380k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS

 SL102 TG-1 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung SL102

 TG-1 iHS SL102 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the SL102.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and SL102.

As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-1 iHS to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger TG-1 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus TG-1 iHS
Portrait photography with Samsung SL102
27
provides face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
24
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-1 iHS
Street photography with Samsung SL102
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
55
lighter than average (116g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
great battery pack (350 shots)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography features
Samsung SL102 Travel photography features
68
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
environment sealing
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
61
lighter than average (116g)
flash built-in
great max aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography details
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography details
46
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
great battery pack (350 shots)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
26
great max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging advice
Samsung SL102 Vlogging advice
36
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone jack
29
great max aperture (f)
provides face detection focus
lighter than average (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung SL102
 Olympus Tough TG-1 iHSSamsung SL102
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS Samsung SL102
Also referred to as - ES55
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-05-08 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 610k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash options - Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 grams (0.51 lbs) 116 grams (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model LI90B -
Self timer Yes (2 and 12 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $399 $130