Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-1 iHS was introduced 20 months before the WB350F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the TG-1 iHS scores versus the WB350F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung WB350F
| TG-1 iHS | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| WB350F | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung WB350F
| TG-1 iHS | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS enjoys physical measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the WB350F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The graphic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and WB350F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to provide extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $260 |