Clicky

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
  • Released May 2012
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-1 iHS was revealed 21 months earlier than the DP2 Quattro making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 TG-1 iHS DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus TG-1 iHS

 DP2 Quattro TG-1 iHS 
RevealedFebruary 2014May 2012Fresher by 21 months
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display resolution920k610kClearer display (+310k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 TG-1 iHS DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS provides outside measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and DP2 Quattro.

Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-1 iHS with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Portrait photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography features
26
provides face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Street photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography info
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Sports photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography features
39
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
good battery pack (350 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
47
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography details
68
good battery pack (350 per charge)
weather proof
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
no Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
53
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography advice
46
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
good battery pack (350 CIPA)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
59
focusing manually
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging information
35
fairly wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic support
9
can't record video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus Tough TG-1 iHSSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Released 2012-05-08 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VI TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 610 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 grams (0.51 pounds) 395 grams (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI90B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 and 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $399 $931