Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f872/6f8720ca8a468a6a857a2e81d2ab270ad6d1a096" alt="Sigma SD10 front Sigma SD10 front"
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Succeeded the Sigma SD9
- Successor is Sigma SD14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sigma SD10, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was manufactured 8 years after the SD10 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the SD10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sigma SD10
TG-1 iHS | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | ![]() | March 2004 | More modern by 100 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 130k | Crisper display (+480k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
SD10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sigma SD10
TG-1 iHS | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with outer measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sigma SD10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the SD10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d5a2/8d5a2cdc65e00fc1e6e5e16717c1a67f99ab8d18" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and SD10 is 91 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19f9b/19f9b1e1b1e309c2307d9c93af3d54becef48d20" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-1 iHS and SD10.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will show extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-1 iHS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82701/82701270ed5746bffdf4f8f4ba3a1c6611daa246" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1417/e141721130529a0727ed2d169127429598780a9b" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sigma SD10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sigma SD10 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2004-03-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 3MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 610k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 950 grams (2.09 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $399 | $198 |