Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
84 Imaging
74 Features
79 Overall
76
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced July 2019
- Refreshed by Sigma fp L
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was manufactured 8 years prior to the fp which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the fp when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Sigma fp. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sigma fp
| TG-1 iHS | fp |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| fp | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2019 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 87 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 2100k |  | 610k | Clearer display (+1490k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sigma fp
| TG-1 iHS | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sigma fp has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the fp.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and fp is 91 and 84 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The image below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and fp.
All in all, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma fp will resolve more detail due to its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sigma fp |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2019-07-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Leica L |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 30 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 2,100k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 422 grams (0.93 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $2,050 |