Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony A200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is fairly similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was unveiled 3 years later than the A200 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-1 iHS matches up against the A200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony A200
TG-1 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2008 | Fresher by 47 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
A200 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony A200
TG-1 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS provides physical measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony A200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-1 iHS versus the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/097a0/097a01023769e2b3950799c5a3a23c98c1efa44b" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and A200 is 91 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aad6/9aad641e1572058120db6ebc4f8ecc90e375d22d" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and A200.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-1 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will offer you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-1 iHS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/660b6/660b6d0ba3f7b2df73238d3d13b491127d48b182" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb881/eb881469167da6a04c98f139e0e0409ef369edfa" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-05-08 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 572 gr (1.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | Compact Flash |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $399 | $100 |