Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched June 2010
- Later Model is Sony NEX-C3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony NEX-3, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is very comparable but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-3 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 24 months after the NEX-3 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the NEX-3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony NEX-3
| TG-1 iHS | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| NEX-3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 610k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony NEX-3
| TG-1 iHS | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers physical dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3 has sizing of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony NEX-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the NEX-3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and NEX-3 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The pic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and NEX-3.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony NEX-3 will produce greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger TG-1 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-05-08 | 2010-06-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 297 gr (0.65 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.0 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 830 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 330 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI90B | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $0 |