Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Refreshed by Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony NEX-3N, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was brought out 9 months earlier than the NEX-3N so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the NEX-3N in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony NEX-3N
TG-1 iHS | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
NEX-3N | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | Fresher by 9 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony NEX-3N
TG-1 iHS | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers physical dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2531b/2531b2cb32061409b073eb35d4b687aee67f70a5" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and NEX-3N is 91 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cecee/cecee5f413704ae9c69ae74a2af6b5c141a47e71" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and NEX-3N.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-1 iHS featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony NEX-3N will resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older TG-1 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6cb3/f6cb3db9731c8cee3ee069cf6d16a1909faf4941" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26f86/26f86219b8dd8a112bd215592e9005e814e836fd" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 480 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $399 | $399 |