Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Launched August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Successor is Sony NEX-3N
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony NEX-F3, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-1 iHS was introduced 3 months before the NEX-F3 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the NEX-F3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony NEX-F3
TG-1 iHS | NEX-F3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
NEX-F3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 610k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony NEX-F3
TG-1 iHS | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | August 2012 | Similar age | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-1 iHS against the NEX-F3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and NEX-F3 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and NEX-F3.
As you can see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 314g (0.69 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 470 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $399 | $470 |