Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Announced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony QX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was released 3 years prior to the QX1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-1 iHS grades versus the QX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony QX1
| TG-1 iHS | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+610k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| QX1 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 28 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony QX1
| TG-1 iHS | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with physical dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has proportions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony QX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the QX1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and QX1 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The image here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and QX1.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony QX1 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 440 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI90B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $500 |
