Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and H400 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-1 iHS was revealed 21 months before the H400 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the H400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony H400
| TG-1 iHS | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| H400 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 21 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony H400
| TG-1 iHS | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got outer dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony H400 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS versus the H400.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and H400 is 91 and 62 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and H400.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Sony H400 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 X 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 628 gr (1.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 300 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $399 | $268 |