Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Released September 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and QX100 (20MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-1 iHS was revealed 16 months before the QX100 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-1 iHS scores versus the QX100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony QX100
| TG-1 iHS | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+610k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| QX100 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2013 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 16 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony QX100
| TG-1 iHS | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has dimensions of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the QX100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and QX100 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and QX100.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-1 iHS having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony QX100 will offer you more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-1 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2013-09-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | - |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | None |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 200 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $268 |
