Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony S2000, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-1 iHS was released 2 years later than the S2000 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-1 iHS matches up against the S2000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony S2000
| TG-1 iHS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 29 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| S2000 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony S2000
| TG-1 iHS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers outside dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony S2000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the S2000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and S2000 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and S2000.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-1 iHS to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The newer TG-1 iHS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $225 |