Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony A35, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and A35 (16MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 8 months after the A35 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-1 iHS grades vs the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sony SLT-A35. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony A35
| TG-1 iHS | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | September 2011 | Newer by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| A35 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 610k | Sharper display (+311k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony A35
| TG-1 iHS | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony A35 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony A35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the A35.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and A35 is 91 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and A35.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A35 will offer you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher TG-1 iHS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2011-09-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 415 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 440 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $399 | $598 |