Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was released 24 months after the VG-145 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS matches up versus the VG-145 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Olympus VG-145. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus VG-145
| TG-2 iHS | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| VG-145 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VG-145
| TG-2 iHS | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the VG-145.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and VG-145 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and VG-145.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-145 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VG-145 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 120g (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 160 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $380 | $0 |