Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VG-160, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-2 iHS was released 18 months later than the VG-160 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-2 iHS matches up versus the VG-160 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus VG-160
| TG-2 iHS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| VG-160 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VG-160
| TG-2 iHS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the VG-160.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and VG-160.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus VG-160 to show extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 165 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $380 | $90 |