Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-2 iHS was launched 11 months later than the VH-410 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the VH-410 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Olympus VH-410. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus VH-410
TG-2 iHS | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | August 2012 | Fresher by 11 months | |
Display resolution | 610k | 460k | Sharper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
VH-410 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VH-410
TG-2 iHS | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outside measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the VH-410.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and VH-410 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and VH-410.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VH-410 to produce more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent TG-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VH-410 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | OLED | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 152g (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $380 | $186 |