Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 7 months later than the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-2 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | December 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| XZ-2 iHS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 610k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-2 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS uses the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field more difficult. The more modern TG-2 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 340 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $380 | $450 |
