Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS16
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the FH2 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-2 iHS was manufactured 2 years later than the FH2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the FH2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH2
| TG-2 iHS | FH2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 31 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FH2 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FH2
| TG-2 iHS | FH2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH2 has measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the FH2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and FH2 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and FH2.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Panasonic FH2 to show greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS16 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 270 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $380 | $149 |