Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS33
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH22, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the FH22 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the FH22 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH22
| TG-2 iHS | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 43 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FH22 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FH22
| TG-2 iHS | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has specifications of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH22 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the FH22.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and FH22 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and FH22.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Panasonic FH22 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 170g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $200 |