Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS35
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and FH25 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-2 iHS was released 2 years after the FH25 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the FH25 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH25
| TG-2 iHS | FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 31 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FH25 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FH25
| TG-2 iHS | FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic FH25 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the FH25.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and FH25 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The pic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and FH25.
All in all, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Panasonic FH25 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | OLED | TFT Screen LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 250 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $380 | $180 |