Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
95 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FS25, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 4 years later than the FS25 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the FS25 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FS25
| TG-2 iHS | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FS25 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FS25
| TG-2 iHS | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FS25 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the FS25.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and FS25 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and FS25.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images however you might want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer TG-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2009-01-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 148g (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $380 | $230 |
