Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb52/1cb52a0c40114d28dcc51a80a6a5ed47ea5f756b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the FX700 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was released 2 years later than the FX700 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the FX700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FX700
TG-2 iHS | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 36 months |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
FX700 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FX700
TG-2 iHS | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Panasonic FX700 has dimensions of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the FX700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f30/78f308798710026a6af30e9042d110905b0d8ef9" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and FX700 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e39e6/e39e6ffc8b7524af145bf43d31656c9ff24e3835" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and FX700.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Panasonic FX700 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54ab8/54ab88d06051f4103a2fc0e042e86e66d39cf933" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15c36/15c36bb87580a7a7854c26fb963bdaacfbb76951" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 176 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $380 | $399 |