Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38


55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Launched June 2014
- Successor is Panasonic FZ2500

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") possess different sensor sizing.

The TG-2 iHS was introduced 11 months prior to the FZ1000 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the FZ1000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ1000
TG-2 iHS | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
FZ1000 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2014 | ![]() | June 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 610k | Sharper display (+311k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000
TG-2 iHS | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 has specifications of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the FZ1000.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and FZ1000 is 91 and 55 respectively.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and FZ1000.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-2 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic FZ1000 will render more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 610k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 831 grams (1.83 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 360 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $380 | $800 |