Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
63 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 606g - 130 x 97 x 118mm
- Announced July 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ70, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and FZ70 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-2 iHS was unveiled about the same time to the FZ70 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the FZ70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ70
| TG-2 iHS | FZ70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ70 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FZ70 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ70
| TG-2 iHS | FZ70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 | July 2013 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ70 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") and a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the FZ70.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and FZ70 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and FZ70.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Panasonic FZ70 to resolve more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ70 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2013-07-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 13.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (50i/60i, 25p/30p), 1280 x 720p (50p/60p or 25p/30p), 640 x 480 (25p/30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 606 grams (1.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 130 x 97 x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 41 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 171 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 400 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $380 | $300 |