Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ6
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS1 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-2 iHS was launched 4 years after the ZS1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the ZS1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS1
| TG-2 iHS | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 51 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| ZS1 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS1
| TG-2 iHS | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS1 has measurements of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the ZS1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and ZS1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and ZS1.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 229 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $0 |