Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Introduced June 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Pentax Efina, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the Efina (14MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-2 iHS was unveiled within a month of the Efina and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the Efina for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Pentax Efina. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax Efina
| TG-2 iHS | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Efina | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax Efina
| TG-2 iHS | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | June 2013 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Pentax Efina has sizing of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Pentax Efina in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the Efina.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and Efina is 91 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and Efina.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Pentax Efina to offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Efina Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Efina | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Efina |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2013-06-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 610k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 91 grams (0.20 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 200 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $10 |