Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77d15/77d15cdea107865b9392e65f3301ad6c2f2bfcfd" alt="Pentax K10D front Pentax K10D front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed December 2006
- Replacement is Pentax K20D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax K10D, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the K10D (10MP) is very well matched but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and K10D (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was manufactured 6 years later than the K10D and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the K10D when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Pentax K10D. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax K10D
TG-2 iHS | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | December 2006 | Fresher by 80 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
K10D | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax K10D
TG-2 iHS | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys outside dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Pentax K10D has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax K10D in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the K10D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b456e/b456e48613771c17645417c7c5c82a1df93dd42d" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and K10D is 91 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3a39/b3a3946811e2def01d644b9228001815f13db549" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and K10D.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e4bd/5e4bd9c363f2c9f80a7e1d5ff5022d9f4a005a5e" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4cf0/d4cf0b6cbf1c9a99e6f2662d0a4a856183a62e21" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K10D Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax K10D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax K10D |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2006-12-15 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 610k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 793 grams (1.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 522 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $380 | $700 |