Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Revealed May 2006
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and K110D (6MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and K110D (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-2 iHS was unveiled 7 years later than the K110D and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the K110D with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Pentax K110D. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax K110D
| TG-2 iHS | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 | May 2006 | More recent by 87 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 210k | Clearer screen (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| K110D | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax K110D
| TG-2 iHS | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers outside measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Pentax K110D has sizing of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the K110D.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and K110D is 91 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The photograph below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and K110D.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will show greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax K110D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax K110D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax K110D |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2006-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $380 | $1,000 |