Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 17 months later than the WG-2 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the WG-2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-2
| TG-2 iHS | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 17 months | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WG-2 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax WG-2
| TG-2 iHS | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outer measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the WG-2.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and WG-2 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and WG-2.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-2 to give extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent TG-2 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 610k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | OLED | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 192g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $380 | $350 |