Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Pentax Q-S1, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-2 iHS was launched 13 months prior to the Q-S1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the Q-S1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax Q-S1
| TG-2 iHS | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Q-S1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2014 |  | June 2013 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax Q-S1
| TG-2 iHS | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Pentax Q-S1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the Q-S1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and Q-S1 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The visual below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and Q-S1.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS has got the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field more difficult. The older TG-2 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2014-08-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 610k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 203 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 250 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $380 | $250 |
