Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Replaced the Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was launched within a month of the Q7 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the Q7 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Pentax Q7. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax Q7
TG-2 iHS | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
Q7 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax Q7
TG-2 iHS | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | August 2013 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Pentax Q7 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/049a3/049a364c9d86e88bf48630f9c74e356dd47b9b02" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and Q7 is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6dfb/e6dfb01f552f043012554264dbbadb1d0e9e9f1c" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and Q7.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS features the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF more challenging.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ce5b/2ce5b534807c1e0fe0d9244185d38c2c07ed7a16" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e92a/4e92a5113728b4486262bde246b1c3c1268156e9" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax Q7 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | OLED | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash settings | - | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 250 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $380 | $480 |