Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38


71 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Released March 2009

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the X70 (12MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The TG-2 iHS was released 4 years later than the X70 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax X70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the X70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Pentax X70. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax X70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax X70
TG-2 iHS | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 53 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax X70 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
X70 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax X70
TG-2 iHS | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Pentax X70 has measurements of 110mm x 83mm x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the X70.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and X70 is 91 and 71 respectively.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and X70.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you will want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer TG-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax X70 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax X70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax X70 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2009-03-02 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 9.10 m |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $380 | $200 |