Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
90 Imaging
56 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- New Model is Ricoh GR II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 3 months later than the GR which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the GR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR
| TG-2 iHS | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| GR | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 610k | Sharper screen (+620k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR
| TG-2 iHS | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | April 2013 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the GR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and GR is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The visual here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and GR.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR will deliver greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GR |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 610k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | OLED | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 290 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $380 | $971 |