Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") feature different sensor size.

The TG-2 iHS was unveiled 3 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-2 iHS grades against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-2 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
GR Digital III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 610k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-2 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has outside dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the GR Digital III.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and GR Digital III is 91 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and GR Digital III.
To sum up, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will provide extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent TG-2 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-06-28 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $380 | $399 |